references/IIEE_Fortune.txt
branchecjdr
changeset 68 be57f0035c67
equal deleted inserted replaced
67:1e85b39d803d 68:be57f0035c67
       
     1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
     2 
       
     3 anyway. <http://www.lumpley.com/>
       
     4 A Penny for Your Thoughts <mailto:lumpley@earthlink.net>
       
     5 
       
     6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
     7 	
       
     8 
       
     9 On 2006-01-17, *Vincent* wrote:
       
    10 
       
    11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
    12 Troy: "/I'm having a little trouble reconciling IIEE and Fortune
       
    13 mechanics. Fortune in the Middle I think I have down no problem. But
       
    14 what about Fortune at the Begining? Where in the IIEE scheme of things
       
    15 does the roll hit the table? Is it still in the Initiation phase?/"
       
    16 
       
    17 "In the middle" and "at the end" don't position fortune in IIEE at all,
       
    18 in any way, ever, no matter what.
       
    19 
       
    20 "In the middle" and "at the end" position fortune in the real-world
       
    21 decision-making process. Do you make mechanical decisions after you
       
    22 roll? Then it's fortune in the middle. Do you not? Then it's fortune at
       
    23 the end. (You can't roll before you make any mechanical decisions, since
       
    24 "I'm going to roll" is a mechanical decision, thus there's no fortune at
       
    25 the beginning.)
       
    26 
       
    27 IIEE is all about the in-game, what the characters are doing at the
       
    28 moment of the roll, what in-game information do you establish before you
       
    29 roll and what do you wait to establish until after you've rolled. What
       
    30 IN-GAME information.
       
    31 
       
    32 If you're a visual thinker, this might help:
       
    33 
       
    34 
       
    35 We can come up with examples of FitM vs. FatE at every point in IIEE, if
       
    36 you're still struggling.
       
    37 	
       
    38 *This reminds me...*
       
    39 Your initials:
       
    40 Link URL:
       
    41 Link text:
       
    42 Please keep your link text short.
       
    43 Please feel free to self-link!
       
    44 Never mind. <comment.php?entry=125>
       
    45 
       
    46 Some maybe useful links:
       
    47 Complete Index of Entries <toc.php?by=cats>
       
    48 Search for a Post or Comment <search.php>
       
    49 Search the Forge Forums <http://www.indie-rpgs.com/search.php>
       
    50 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
    51  
       
    52 *This makes...*
       
    53 *TC* go "Makes Good Sense..."
       
    54 I got it now. It's the division between character and player. Makes much
       
    55 better sense now. Thanks a lot! :)
       
    56 *JCL* go "I disagree about Fortune in the Beginning."
       
    57 Anything that is true of all possible states should be ignored when
       
    58 defining the possible states. Since rolling dice *always* involves a
       
    59 decision to roll the dice, that particular decision is irrelevant: you
       
    60 can't decide *not* to roll the dice and still have FitM/FatE, because
       
    61 there wouldn't be any Fortune to discuss in that situation. Therefore,
       
    62 it's irrelevant to Fortune in the Beginning, too. I would say that the
       
    63 relevant mechanical decisions aren't those that affect *whether* you
       
    64 roll, but *how*. Everything you said about FitM and FatE are true: if
       
    65 your decisions boost or diminish your die roll in some way before you've
       
    66 made the roll, that's FatE. If you can boost it afterwards, it's FitM.
       
    67 If you can't modify it at all, it's FitB. However, I tried a FitB system
       
    68 with Troubadours of Verticaille, and that game designs sucks. So my
       
    69 conclusion is that FitB exists, but isn't useful.
       
    70 *VB* go "JCL: fair enough."
       
    71  
       
    72 *This makes me go...*
       
    73 Your initials:
       
    74 Your response:
       
    75 Explanation (optional):
       
    76 
       
    77 This is for short comments, corrections, praise, me toos, stuff like
       
    78 that. Briefly, please!
       
    79 Never mind. <comment.php?entry=125>
       
    80 
       
    81 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
    82 
       
    83 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
    84 
       
    85 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
    86 
       
    87 anyway. <http://www.lumpley.com/>
       
    88 
       
    89 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
    90 	 
       
    91