RPGnet <http://www.rpg.net> 	

<http://www.rpg.net/slib/ads/forward-ad.php?nextURL=http://www.drivethrurpg.com/catalog/index.php&imageURL=http://graphics.drivethrurpg.com/images/dtrpgbanner728x90.gif>

	Reviews <http://www.rpg.net/reviews/> 	Forums <http://forum.rpg.net>

News & Press <http://www.rpg.net/news+reviews/press.phtml> 	Columns &

Info <http://www.rpg.net/columns/index.phtml> 	RPG Wiki

<http://wiki.rpg.net> 	RPG Shop <http://shop.rpg.net> 	

<http://www.rpg.net/members/>

BUILDING BETTER CHARACTERS #1: THE SEVEN RULES OF CHARACTER CREATION

/A couple sessions have gone by. You got the rulebook, you built a

character, you played. But it hasn't been what you were after. Your

character seems flat, you haven't gotten into it. Except to argue with

the elf. You ask yourself ? did I do something wrong?/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

/Your party built their characters, you played, but they are always

going their separate ways or arguing. The thief doesn't even associate

with the party except to drool over their equipment. Something has to

change if everyone is going to have fun./

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The art of building characters is not as simple as one might think.

Every rulebook has the steps. Many of those rulebooks even talk about

meta-gaming issues, background, personality, or whatever other pet

theories the authors happen to have about what makes good characters.

But let me simplify it just a little bit. Good characters are those

characters that are fun to play. Not just for the player, but for the

whole group (including the GM). This may sound like just a trademark of

a good player, but really, what great player does not always come up

with good characters? Even things that seem simple or sketchy just seem

to come to life in these players. They know how to make good characters.

And I am here to try and help /you/ make better characters.

We are going to start with the basics: the seven rules of character

creation. At least, the seven rules for creating characters in a

campaign setting. (That is, where there is a group of more then one

person, and there are going to be multiple adventures with the characters.)

Rule 1: The character must work in a group

Rule 2: The character must be fun for the player and the rest of the party

Rule 3: The character must be good at heart

Rule 4: The character must have a reason to go adventuring

Rule 5: The character must fit the campaign style

Rule 6: The character must have long term goals

Rule 7: The player must be able to actually play the character

The seven rules represent the most common (and most disastrous) mistakes

that players make when designing characters. Sometimes these are just

overlooked, or missed in the heat of character creation, but if the GM

and the player can apply these rules to a character (and agree that they

are in fact applicable to the character) then any subsequent problems

lie on the shoulders of the player and the GM, not on the character.

"But that's what my character would do..." is no longer an excuse for

destroying party chemistry or backstabbing a fellow party member. The

rules have been set.

The seven rules are broken out into three sections: Getting along with

people (rules 1,2,3), character composition (rules (4,5,6) and "the

final gut check" (rule 7).

    Section 1: Getting along with other people

The first three rules apply to just making sure the /character/ (not the

player) isn't disruptive to the group as a whole. Essentially, these

rules exist to avoid the Neutral Evil Ninja Assasin Drow (NENAD), and

all sub-species. (Not that I am singling out Neutral evil ninja assasin

drow as poor characters, but well, I am.) So let's go through them.

      Rule 1: The character must work in a group

This is a logical aspect of the meta-game. You are planning a campaign.

That campaign has multiple players. More then likely you plan on them

being a group. So why let characters that dislike people or only work

alone into such a group? In the most logical sense, they wouldn't go

adventuring in a group and would hate it if they did. Watch out for

characters that hate people, or are overly secretive and mysterious. Or

classic thief types that never trust any party members and, in fact,

remove trust from other party members.

Not to say these sorts of characters can't be played. But make sure that

when the NENAD attempts to join your campaign, that there is a good

reason that they would stay with a group, work with a group, and might

even be trusted by that group. Obviously, this is a GM judgement call in

the end, just remember the concept. If they can't work in a group, the

character isn't going to work in a (traditional) campaign.

      Rule 2: The character must be fun for the player and the rest of

      the party

One assumes that people play characters that they find fun. NENAD are

usually considered very fun /by the people playing them./ But usually it

is best to think of the other players as well. Are they going to enjoy

this character? This is really the flip side of rule 1; rule 1 makes it

sound like characters should be dull and boring and fit it. But we don't

want characters ending up with desk jobs in cubicle world. We want the

mohawk wearing, leather jacketed rebel. Sure, while they have to "be

able to be part of group" they also need to add a different dimension, a

different personality, and a different /character/ to the group as a

whole, so that the players have variety and spice in their role-playing.

Some players find this very easy. The rest of us struggle to make sure

that our character is adding to the combined story, has good lines, or

is just a fun personality that people enjoy and remember. And don't take

this as meaning that it is a character's duty to always entertain the

other players. No, occasionally entertaining them is good enough. In

fact, it is much better, as people have the most fun by /playing their

own characters./ If you want to ruin someone's fun, play their character

for them (or prevent their character from playing ? a closely related

offense). This can be the fault of the GM or the player, but it is the

quickest way to dissatisfied players and a point to pay specific

attention to when designing your character. Now it is not always

possible to avoid these conflicts, especially when you are unaware of

other player's character choices, but keep it in mind even after play

has begun.

      Rule 3: The character must be good at heart

Now I don't want to be preachy or anything, but just what were you

expecting when you created that evil character that truly didn't care

about other people? Were you expecting him to be smoothly integrated

into the party? Did you expect him to be trusted? Were you surprised

when he caused party turmoil? When your NENAD decided not to open the

secret door and try and save the party from the rampaging barbarian <#>

horde, did they accept the excuse that it was too risky?

D&D takes care of this by making sure characters are good or neutral.

But I don't think that is truly enough. This is not a question of

overlying beliefs. This is a question of /will the character risk their

life and livelihood to help another?/ This is about not being

self-centered. This is about being someone that the party can trust when

the ork dung hits the wind mill. This isn't something that you say

during character description, it is something that you do and

(hopefully) you do early on. If your character makes some sort of self

sacrifice, even a small one, in the first session, the party is already

on your side.

A lot of players don't like this rule, but it is the very last rule that

I bend. We are roleplaying to be heroes, so design a hero or don't play.

Every single hero in books and movies was intrinsically good at heart,

no matter how otherwise messed up, or they weren't a hero. It is the

definition.

    Conclusion

In the next column I will continue the analysis of the seven rules with

the remaining four. If you were intrigued by this column, you can check

out my blog and role-playing resources at www.blackshieldgaming.com

<http://www.blackshieldgaming.com>.

Until next time.

ARTICLE INFO 	<building.xml>

*Building Better Characters #1*

/The Seven Rules of Character Creation/

2006-02-21

by Greg Schneider

/The first rules of campaign characters: getting along with others./

RECENT ARTICLES

#1: The Seven Rules of Character Creation

<http://www.rpg.net/columns/building/building1.phtml>

Gencon:

GenCon <http://www.gencon.com/>

Downloadable RPGs:

DTRPG <http://www.dtrpg.com>

*/Visit our Sponsors!/*

RECENT DISCUSSIONS

*Thread Title* 	*Last Poster* 	*Last Post* 	*Replies*

Does ANYONE agree?

<http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?threadid=248154&goto=newpost>

Strange Visitor

<http://forum.rpg.net/member.php?action=getinfo&userid=9385> 	03-07-2006

09:27 AM 	20

There're only two rules...

<http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?threadid=248028&goto=newpost>

Bartmoss <http://forum.rpg.net/member.php?action=getinfo&userid=8578>

03-02-2006 10:32 AM 	10

Disagree with Rule 3

<http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?threadid=247415&goto=newpost>

Maarzan <http://forum.rpg.net/member.php?action=getinfo&userid=1472>

02-27-2006 08:42 AM 	26

#1: The Seven Rules of Character Creation

<http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?threadid=247361&goto=newpost>

RPGnet Columns

<http://forum.rpg.net/member.php?action=getinfo&userid=24795>

02-21-2006 12:00 AM 	0

( goto forum <http://forum.rpg.net/forumdisplay.php?f=66> | post new

thread <http://forum.rpg.net/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=66> )

[ Read FAQ <http://forum.rpg.net/faq.php> | Subscribe to RSS

<http://www.rpg.net/rss.phtml> | Contact Us <mailto:www@rpg.net> |

Advertise with Us <http://www.rpg.net/ads/info.phtml> ]

Copyright © 1996-2006 RPGnet & individual authors, All Rights Reserved

RPGnet® is a registered trademark of Skotos Tech Inc., all rights reserved.